A vulnerability has been recently discovered when using JNBridgePro with the TCP/binary or HTTP/SOAP channels. JNBridge has implemented an IP whitelisting mechanism to address this issue.
“JNBridgePro’s performance far exceeded our expectations. It provided a 3-fold increase in our deployment efficiency over our previous IKVM-based solution. In addition, JNBridgePro offers an easy-to-use interface for our customers.”
//jnbridge.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/JNBridgeLOGO_Update2.png00jnbridge//jnbridge.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/JNBridgeLOGO_Update2.pngjnbridge2019-05-21 14:55:292019-05-21 14:55:29Progress Corticon Chooses JNBridgePro for Higher Performance and Ease of Use
If you’ve looked at our new .NET Core components for JNBridgePro, you’ve probably noticed that there are a lot of new DLLs with names like Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.dll. What’s up with that?
//jnbridge.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/JNBridgeLOGO_Update2.png00jnbridge//jnbridge.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/JNBridgeLOGO_Update2.pngjnbridge2019-05-16 07:00:272019-05-08 17:49:31Why all the extensions in the .NET Core version of JNBridgePro?
For .NET Core-to-Java projects, you’ll need to use a proxy generation tool associated with .NET Framework. Why, and what are we going to do about this?
JNBridgePro 10.1 offers new network security options
/in JNBridgePro, New features, Security /JNBridgePro 10.1 adds new security features including SSL communications, class whitelisiting, and IP whitelisting.
JNBridgePro and Network Security
/in JNBridgePro, Security, Tips and Examples /A vulnerability has been recently discovered when using JNBridgePro with the TCP/binary or HTTP/SOAP channels. JNBridge has implemented an IP whitelisting mechanism to address this issue.
Progress Corticon Chooses JNBridgePro for Higher Performance and Ease of Use
/in Announcements, Case studies, JNBridgePro /“JNBridgePro’s performance far exceeded our expectations. It provided a 3-fold increase in our deployment efficiency over our previous IKVM-based solution. In addition, JNBridgePro offers an easy-to-use interface for our customers.”
Why all the extensions in the .NET Core version of JNBridgePro?
/in .NET, .NET Core, JNBridgePro /If you’ve looked at our new .NET Core components for JNBridgePro, you’ve probably noticed that there are a lot of new DLLs with names like Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.dll. What’s up with that?
Why doesn’t the JNBridgePro for .NET Core proxy tool generate proxy DLLs?
/in .NET, .NET Core, .NET Framework, JNBridgePro /For .NET Core-to-Java projects, you’ll need to use a proxy generation tool associated with .NET Framework. Why, and what are we going to do about this?